ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Ethnic disparities in early-onset colorectal cancer incidence, screening rates and risk factors prevalence in Guam.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Cultural and Age-Specific Preferences to Develop a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention for CHamorus and Filipinos in Guam-Findings from a Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the four most common cancers and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Guam. This study investigated CRC incidence, screening, and risk factors of early onset CRC across Guam's ethnic groups using data from the Guam Cancer Registry (1998-2020) and the Guam Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2018-2019). Methods: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to compare incidence rates across different age groups stratified by sex, ethnicity, and stage. Incidence rate differences (IRDs) were used to test for significant differences across sex and ethnicity. The Pearson chi-square test was used to assess differences in CRC screening rates by age, sex, education, income, healthcare coverage, and ethnicity, and to examine ethnic group disparities in the prevalence of CRC risk factors. Results: The steepest increase in CRC incidence was observed between the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups (IRR = 2.01; 95 % CI: 1.14-3.53) and between the 40-44 and 45-49 age groups (IRR = 1.99; 95 % CI: 1.34-2.97). CHamorus exhibited rate increases at younger ages compared to Filipinos. CRC screening prevalence and associated risk factors showed considerable variation among ethnicities. Conclusions: Elevated early-onset CRC rates were observed for both CHamorus and the broader Guam population under 50. The findings support the new recommendation to begin screening at age 45 and efforts to increase screening in Guam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.