Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883811›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Molecular fingerprint and machine learning enhance high-performance MOFs for mustard gas removal.

Jing Ni, Jinfeng Li, Shuhua Li, He Zheng, Zhongyuan Ming, Li Li, Heguo Li, Shouxin Zhang, Yue Zhao, Hong Liang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing NiGuangzhou Key Laboratory for New Energy and Green Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jinfeng LiGuangzhou Key Laboratory for New Energy and Green Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Shuhua LiGuangzhou Key Laboratory for New Energy and Green Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
He ZhengState Key Lab NBC Protect Civilian, Beijing 102205, P.R. China.
Zhongyuan MingGuangzhou Key Laboratory for New Energy and Green Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Li LiState Key Lab NBC Protect Civilian, Beijing 102205, P.R. China.
Heguo LiState Key Lab NBC Protect Civilian, Beijing 102205, P.R. China.
Shouxin ZhangState Key Lab NBC Protect Civilian, Beijing 102205, P.R. China.
Yue ZhaoState Key Lab NBC Protect Civilian, Beijing 102205, P.R. China.
Hong LiangGuangzhou Key Laboratory for New Energy and Green Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zhiwei QiaoGuangzhou Key Laboratory for New Energy and Green Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical warfare agents (CWAs), epitomized by the notoriously used mustard gas (HD), represent a class of exceptionally toxic chemicals whose airborne removal is paramount for battlefield safety. This study integrates high-throughput computational screening (HTCS) with advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to investigate the efficacy of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in adsorbing and capturing trace amounts of HD present in the air. Our approach commenced with a comprehensive univariate analysis, scrutinizing the impact of six distinct descriptors on the adsorption efficiency of MOFs. This analysis elucidated a pronounced correlation between MOF density and the Henry coefficient in the effective capture of HD. Then, four ML algorithms were employed to train and predict the performance of MOFs. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm demonstrates strong model learning and good generalization, achieving the best prediction result of 98.3%. In a novel exploratory stride, we incorporated a 166-bit MACCS molecular fingerprinting (MF) to identify critical functional groups within adsorbents. From the top 100 MOFs analyzed, 22 optimal functional groups were identified. Leveraging these insights, we designed three innovative substructures, grounded in these key functional groups, to enhance HD adsorption efficiency. In this work, the combination of MF and ML could provide a new direction for efficient screening of MOFs for the capture of HD in the air. The outcomes of this study offer substantial potential to revolutionize the domain of CWA capture. This represents a significant stride toward developing practical solutions that enhance both environmental protection and battlefield security.

Indexed as

ChemistryMaterials scienceNatural sciences

Identifiers

PMID38883811
PMCPMC11177195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.