ArticleResearch square2024
Structures and Strategies for Retaining an International Pediatric Cohort from Birth: Lessons from The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) Study.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00279318 (Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Retention of study participants in observational studies is essential to maintaining the representativeness of the population, minimizing selection bias, and assuring sufficient statistical power. The aim of this report is to describe the structures and strategies used to retain participants in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) Study, an observational study of children at increased genetic risk for type 1 diabetes followed in an intense protocol with frequent clinic visits from birth until age 15. Methods: A systematic review of methodologies used to retain research subjects identified four domains: barrier reduction strategies; community building strategies; follow-up/reminder strategies; and tracing strategies. Independent reviewers categorized the retention strategies implemented by the TEDDY Study into each of these domains. Strategies not fitting into any of these categories were placed into a fifth category unique to TEDDY. Results: TEDDY identified over one hundred retention strategies used during the 15 years of follow-up; most could be categorized in these domains. Those unique to TEDDY included (1) study organization and structures to support retention; (2) efforts to meet the changing developmental needs of the TEDDY population, (3) implementation of efforts to address protocol challenges in real-time; and (4) employment of a re-engagement protocol for those who had dropped out of the study. Conclusion: Pediatric cohort studies should include strategies, structures, and resources addressing retention at the study's initiation. It is recommended that child and parent engagement in addition to the developmental needs of the child be an integrated focus of all strategies. Putting mechanisms in place to address protocol and retention challenges in real time would facilitate effectively addressing challenges as they arise. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00279318.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.