ArticleResearch square2024
Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning to Assess Upper Limb Function in Huntington's Disease.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Huntington's disease (HD), like many other neurological disorders, affects both lower and upper limb function that is typically assessed in the clinic - providing a snapshot of disease symptoms. Wearable sensors enable the collection of real-world data that can complement such clinical assessments and provide a more comprehensive insight into disease symptoms. In this context, almost all studies are focused on assessing lower limb function via monitoring of gait, physical activity and ambulation. In this study, we monitor upper limb function during activities of daily living in individuals with HD (n = 16), prodromal HD (pHD, n = 7), and controls (CTR, n = 16) using a wrist-worn wearable sensor, called PAMSys ULM, over seven days. The participants were highly compliant in wearing the sensor with an average daily compliance of 99% (100% for HD, 98% for pHD, and 99% for CTR). Goal-directed movements (GDM) of the hand were detected using a deep learning model, and kinematic features of each GDM were estimated. The collected data was used to predict disease groups (i.e., HD, pHD, and CTR) and clinical scores using a combination of statistical and machine learning-based models. Significant differences in GDM features were observed between the groups. HD participants performed fewer GDMs with long duration (> 7.5 seconds) compared to CTR (p-val = 0.021, d = -0.86). In velocity and acceleration metrics, the highest effect size feature was the entropy of the velocity zero-crossing length segments (HD vs CTR p-val <0.001, d = -1.67; HD vs pHD p-val = 0.043, d=-0.98; CTR vs pHD p-val = 0.046, d=0.96). In addition, this same variable showed a strongest correlation with clinical scores. Classification models achieved good performance in distinguishing HD, pHD and CTR individuals with a balanced accuracy of 67% and a 0.72 recall for the HD group, while regression models accurately predicted clinical scores. Notably the explained variance for the upper extremity function subdomain scale of Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) was the highest, with the model capturing 60% of the variance. Our findings suggest the potential of wearables and machine learning for early identification of phenoconversion, remote monitoring in HD, and evaluating new treatments efficacy in clinical trials and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.