Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883700›Full record

ArticleJournal of hospital librarianship2024

Exploring Freely Available Data Tools to Support Open Data and Open Science.

Christine Hislop, Katie Pierce Farrier, Elizabeth Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hospital librarianship, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine HislopData Education Librarian for the Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM), Region 1 at the Health Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-4228
Katie Pierce FarrierData Science Strategist for NNLM, Region 3, Gibson D. Lewis Library, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX.ORCID 0009-0006-8559-0223
Elizabeth Rothpreviously the Research and Data Science Strategist for NNLM, Region 2, James w. Colbert Education Center and Library, Medical University of South Caroline Libraries, Charleston, SC.ORCID 0009-0005-6326-5887

Funding

Regional Medical Library for Region 3 of the Network of the National Library of Medicine: ProgramUG4LM012345 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Daniel Eric Burgard · 2016 to 2026
$13.7M
RML CoreUG4LM013724 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Emily Hurst · 2021 to 2026
$11.8M
Region 2 Regional Medical Library - RML CoreUG4LM013736 · NLM · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SHANNON D JONES · 2021 to 2026
$7.4M
NLM NIH HHS UG4 LM012345NLM NIH HHS UG4 LM013724NLM NIH HHS UG4 LM013736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Librarians support researchers by promoting open science and open data practices. This article explores five freely available tools that support and facilitate open science practices. Open Science Framework provides a platform for project management, data sharing, and data storage. OpenRefine cleans and formats data. DMPTool has templates for data management and sharing plans that comply with funder mandates. The NIH Common Data Elements is a repository for standardized data elements, and finally, the NLM Scrubber is a tool for de-identifying clinical text data. Information professionals can add these tools to their repertoire and share them with researchers at their institution.

Indexed as

data managementOpen dataopen science

Identifiers

PMID38883700
PMCPMC11178281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.