Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883688›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Presurgical invasive mediastinal staging in lung cancer, unexpected N2 and long-term survival: a registry-based study with data from the Spanish group for video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Iker López, Borja Aguinagalde, Iratxe Urreta, Iñigo Royo, Sergio Bolufer, Laura Sánchez, Jon Zabaleta, Arantza Fernández-Monge, Raúl Embún

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Iker LópezThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián-Donostia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-0801
Borja AguinagaldeThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián-Donostia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-3579
Iratxe UrretaBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute, San Sebastián-Donostia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-6033
Iñigo RoyoThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Miguel Servet and Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-5720
Sergio BoluferThoracic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8285-5488
Laura SánchezThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Jon ZabaletaThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián-Donostia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-0580
Arantza Fernández-MongeThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián-Donostia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5699-1742
Raúl EmbúnThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Miguel Servet and Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0249-3104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mediastinal lymph node staging is a key element in the diagnosis of lung cancer. The combination of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) has improved staging but some circumstances are known to influence their negative predictive value. The objective of this study was to assess the impact on survival of avoiding invasive mediastinal staging in surgical lung cancer patients with negative mediastinum in CT and PET and intermediate risk of unexpected pN2. Methods: Data were collected from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Group for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (GEVATS), from December 2016 to March 2018. For this study, patients were selected if they had negative mediastinum in CT and PET findings but tumours >3 cm or located centrally, or with cN1 disease. Patients who did and did not undergo invasive staging [invasive group (IG) and non-invasive group (NIG)] were compared, analysing unexpected pN2 and survival with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: A total of 2,826 patients underwent surgery for primary lung cancer. We selected 1,247 patients who had tumours >3 cm, central tumours or cN1. Invasive staging was performed in 275 (22.1%) cases. The unexpected pN2 rate was 9.6% in the NIG and 13.8% in the IG, but half of them were discovered prior to surgery in the IG. Five-year overall survival (OS) was poorer in the IG (52.4% Conclusions: Invasive staging recommended by guidelines could be reduced with an appropriate selection in mediastinal CT- and PET-negative patients with risk factors for unexpected pN2, because rates of pN2 and survival did not worsen without invasive staging.

Indexed as

invasive stagingLung cancerlung resectionmediastinal stagingsurvival

Identifiers

PMID38883688
PMCPMC11170386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.