ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Causal relationship between renal function and risk of esophageal cancer: insights from Mendelian randomization.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have indicated a potential correlation between renal function and risk of cancer. However, establishing a causal relationship is challenging. To address this, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR), a novel method that utilizes genotype data to simulate randomized trial groups, to investigate whether there is a causal correlation between renal function and the esophageal cancer (EC) risk. Methods: MR analysis was conducted with the individual-level data on EC from the UK Biobank published dataset. Genetic instruments were derived from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) extracted from publicly available genome-wide association studies. Furthermore, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of individual SNPs. Results: In our MR analysis, we examined 39,475,182 SNPs associated with various renal functional indexes from public databases. Based on the primary causal effects model using MR analyses with the inverse variance weighted method, the genetically predicted cystatin C [odds ratio (OR) =1.0005, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0000-1.0009; P=0.05] and creatinine (OR =1.0016, 95% CI: 1.0002-1.0031; P=0.02) demonstrated a significant association with higher risk of EC. However, we found no evidence of an association between urinary albumin and glomerular filtration rate with the risk of EC. Conclusions: Our research provides strong evidence for the association of decreased renal function to a potential risk of EC. However, it is crucial to recognize the necessity for additional large-scale prospective studies to validate this discovery and establish a comprehensive understanding of the causal relationships between renal function and EC. Keywords: Esophageal cancer (EC); renal function; Mendelian randomization (MR); causal association.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.