ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Clinically important pulmonary vascular variations: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Unusual Pulmonary Vascular Connection Encountered During Right Upper Lobectomy.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Three-Dimensional Reconstruction System Reduced Unexpected Procedural Changes in Thoracic Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Bronchovascular Modelling in Sublobar Pulmonary Resection: A Tool for Personalised Thoracic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Surgical technique for minimally invasive segmentectomies of the right lung: anatomic rationale for a posterior approach.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Pulmonary vascular variations are a major factor in thoracic surgeries. Minimally invasive techniques, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) used in non-small lung cancer treatment, have a limited field of view and no haptic feedback. Additionally, new studies suggest that segmentectomies are beneficial for patients. Accurate knowledge of vascular patterns and variants is crucial for conducting such procedures safely. The aim of this review was to systematize data in a useful manner from studies and case reports concerning pulmonary vascular variations and patterns. Methods: We conducted a search on the PubMed and Embase databases. We used classifications of Nagashima, Yamashita, Boyden, Maciejewski, and Shimizu. Key Content and Findings: The analysis showed that more data on the incidence rate and vascular patterns of certain bronchopulmonary segments are needed. Venous variations are a major factor in segmental resections, but additional data regarding incidence and pattern types are needed. Surgeons need to be aware of vascular variations as they can influence procedures in seemingly unrelated areas. The majority of studies emphasize the use of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) for accurate planning of any thoracic procedures. Conclusions: Abnormal vessels pose a risk in various procedures performed within the thorax, and the data in this review could be valuable in different medical areas in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.