Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883662›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Multimodal prehabilitation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a feasibility study.

David W G Ten Cate, Rosaline van den Berg, Maaike Scholten-Bakker, Charlotte J L Molenaar, Erik M von Meyenfeldt, Gerrit D Slooter, Frank J C van den Broek, Geertruid M H Marres

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07159646 (Athletic Intervention After THoracic surgEry for luNg cAncer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07159646 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Athletic Intervention After THoracic surgEry for luNg cAncer: a Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled10ConditionsNon-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Armsexercise interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David W G Ten CateDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Rosaline van den BergScience Office, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Maaike Scholten-BakkerDepartment of Pulmonology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Charlotte J L MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Erik M von MeyenfeldtDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Gerrit D SlooterDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Frank J C van den BroekDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Geertruid M H MarresDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anatomic pulmonary resection is the preferred curative treatment in operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is associated with postoperative complications and inevitable compromise in functional capacity. Preoperative enhancement of functional capacity can be achieved with prehabilitation, yet the window of opportunity in NSCLC patients is small because patients are required to undergo surgery within 3 weeks from diagnosis. The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of a prehabilitation programme in NSCLC within a 3-week timeframe and its effect on functional capacity-although the study was not powered to confirm improvements in functional capacity. Methods: Prehabilitation consisted of six interventions: exercise programme, nutritional support, mental support, smoking cessation, patient empowerment, and optimisation of respiratory status and was executed in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Assessments were scheduled at baseline (T0), end of program preoperatively (T1), and 6 weeks postoperatively (T2). Feasibility was defined as ≥80% of participants completing ≥80% of the programme. Functional capacity [6-minute walk test (6MWT), steep ramp test (SRT), one repetition maximum (1RM), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and hand grip strength (HGS)] was evaluated on T1 and T2 compared to T0 using mixed model analyses. Results: In total, 24 patients were included. In 95.8% of patients, the program proved feasible and preoperative functional capacity significantly improved in all pre-specified tests on T1. 1RM sustained improved at T2. Conclusions: Multimodal prehabilitation for lung surgery is feasible within a timeframe of 3 weeks. Even though this study was not powered to confirm it, prehabilitation may improve preoperative functional capacity.

Indexed as

feasibilityfunctional capacitylung surgeryPrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38883662
PMCPMC11170373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.