ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Development of neuromodulation for atrial fibrillation: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent clinical arrhythmia with a high incidence of disability and mortality. Autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a crucial role in the onset and persistence of AF, and can lead to electrophysiological changes and alterations in atrial structure. Both animal models and clinical findings suggest that parasympathetic and sympathetic activity within the cardiac ANS could induce atrial remodeling and AF. Remodeling of the cardiac autonomic nerves is a significant structural basis for promoting AF. Given the challenges faced by conventional pharmacological and atrial ablation techniques in the treatment of AF, increasing attention has been paid to autonomic intervention strategies for AF. Current research has demonstrated that the frequency and severity of AF episodes can be significantly reduced by modulating the activity of ANS. ANS neuromodulation is expected to lead more effective and personalized treatment options for patients with AF. The objective of this review is to provide a broader perspective for future related studies by reviewing preclinical and clinical studies of neuromodulation methods for the treatment of AF, searching for relevant approaches to treat AF, as well as identifying the strengths and weaknesses demonstrated by current relevant studies, and providing researchers with a broader overview of the latest neurological treatments for AF. Methods: A narrative review was conducted on the literature on PubMed, WanFang data, and Google Scholar, including all relevant studies published until November 2023. Key Content and Findings: In this review, we delve into the innervation of cardiac autonomic nerves, the role of the ANS in the development and maintenance of AF, and the current neuromodulation methods for AF treatment. These methods include stellate ganglion (SG) resection or ablation, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), thoracic subcutaneous nerve stimulation (ScNS), renal denervation (RDN) therapy, ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation, and epicardial botulinum toxin or CaCl Conclusions: ANS plays a crucial role in AF development and maintenance through cardiac autonomic nerve remodeling. Modulating ANS activity can significantly reduce AF frequency and severity, offering more personalized treatment options. Current research on autonomic interventions for AF shows promise for more effective and personalized treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.