ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
The clinical, radiological, postoperative pathological, and genetic features of nodular lung adenocarcinoma: a real-world single-center data.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicoradiologic features and evolutionary characteristics of pulmonary focal mucinous adenocarcinomas across different density patterns: a retrospective multi-center study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical symptoms and prognosis of patients with pulmonary nodules: a real-world cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinically relevant somatic variants and genomic discordance between primary tumors and mediastinal lymph nodes in lung adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Analysis of tumor cell proliferation (Ki-67) and cell cycle regulator proteins in lung adenocarcinoma with different radiological subtypes.Respiratory research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The preoperative differential diagnosis of nodular lung adenocarcinoma has long been a challenging issue for thoracic surgeons. This study aimed to explore differential diagnosis of nodular lung adenocarcinoma by comprehensively analyzing its clinical, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and postoperative pathological and genetic features. Methods: The clinical, CT imaging, and postoperative pathological features of different classifications of nodular lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed through univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Results: There were 132 patients with nodular lung adenocarcinoma enrolled. Firstly, compared with ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma, solid nodular lung adenocarcinoma was more common in women [odds ratio (OR), 3.662; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.066-12.577] and older adults (OR, 1.061; 95% CI: 1.007-1.119), and CT signs were mostly lobulation (OR, 4.957; 95% CI: 1.714-14.337) and spiculation (OR, 8.214; 95% CI: 2.740-24.621); the mean CT (CT Conclusions: Different classifications of nodular lung adenocarcinoma have their own clinicopathological and CT imaging features, and the latter is the main predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.