ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: clinical outcomes of 60 consecutive cases.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Steroid refractory rapidly progressing organising pneumonia.BMJ case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Organizing pneumonia after lamotrigine initiation: A case report, case series review, and narrative literature review.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia complicated by pulmonary embolism following glucocorticoid therapy: a case report.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- The Clinical Significance of Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features in Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) improves rapidly following corticosteroid treatment; however, relapse is common. Therefore, this retrospective observational study aimed to clarify the clinical outcomes of COP and identify the predictive factors for relapse. Methods: The laboratory findings, pulmonary function test results, computed tomography (CT) findings, and clinical outcomes of 60 consecutive COP patients treated at our institution between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical characteristics of COP patients who did and did not show improvement were compared to identify the predictive factors for relapse in patients showing improvement. Results: Forty-one patients showed improvement without relapsing (Group 1), whereas thirteen relapsed after showing improvement (Group 2). Six patients did not show any improvement (Group 3). The serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels in Group 3 were greater than those in Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.004). The incidence of traction bronchiectasis and reticular opacities in Group 3 was higher than that in Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.048 and P=0.006, respectively). The cut-off levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), blood neutrophil fraction (%neutrophils) and lymphocyte fraction (%lymphocytes) for predicting relapse were 6.84 mg/dL, 68.7% and 14.1% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The log-rank test revealed that high serum CRP levels (P<0.001), high %neutrophils (P=0.003) and low %lymphocytes (P=0.006) showed significant correlations with a shorter time to the first relapse episode. Conclusions: Chest CT findings depicting pulmonary fibrosis and high serum KL-6 levels were correlated with the non-improvement of COP. Blood test results indicating inflammatory reactions were correlated with relapse in patients with COP showing improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.