ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
A new prognostic model for recurrent pregnancy loss: assessment of thyroid and thromboelastograph parameters.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss: a narrative systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- The value of coagulation index in thromboelastography for predicting early pregnancy loss in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multivariable AI-based analysis of immune-lifestyle patterns associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: an exploratory retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Can preconception hematologic and biochemical parameters predict the subsequent pregnancy loss in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Use of oral allylestrenol in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A retrospective clinical trial.Global health & medicine · 2024Article
- "Unraveling the Clot-Miscarriage Nexus: Mechanisms, Management, and Future Directions in Thrombosis-Related Recurrent Pregnancy Loss".Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify predictors associated with thyroid function and thromboelastograph (TEG) examination parameters and establish a nomogram for predicting the risk of subsequent pregnancy loss in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the medical records of 575 RPL patients treated at Lanzhou University Second Hospital, China, between September 2020 and December 2022, as a training cohort. We also included 272 RPL patients from Ruian People's Hospital between January 2020 and July 2022 as external validation cohort. Predictors included pre-pregnancy thyroid function and TEG examination parameters. The study outcome was pregnancy loss before 24 weeks of gestation. Variable selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and stepwise regression analyses, and the prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression. The study evaluated the model's performance using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Additionally, dynamic and static nomograms were constructed to provide a visual representation of the models. Results: The predictors used to develop the model were body mass index, previous pregnancy losses, triiodothyronine, free thyroxine, thyroid stimulating hormone, lysis at 30 minutes, and estimated percent lysis which were determined by the multivariable logistic regression with the minimum Akaike information criterion of 605.1. The model demonstrated good discrimination with an AUC of 0.767 (95%CI 0.725-0.808), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good fitness of the predicting variables with a Conclusions: This nomogram well-predicted the risk of future pregnancy loss in RPL and can be used by clinicians to identify high-risk patients and provide a reference for pregnancy management of RPL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.