ArticleMethodsX2024
Investigating the impact of inhaled paraquat: A comprehensive evaluation protocol.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the role of curcumin, nanocurcumin, and a PPAR agonist in preventing paraquat-induced systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in rats.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a complete protocol for studying the effects of inhaled paraquat (PQ), a toxic herbicide that has negative effects systemically and on the lungs. The protocol aims to evaluate the effects of aerosolized PQ exposure on lung and systemic injury in an animal model, which will provide significant information for therapeutic interventions for PQ-induced pulmonary and systemic damage. The protocol involves the following key components: 1. Study groups: By including control, non-treated aerosolized PQ-exposed, and treated PQ-exposed animals with various agent groups in the experiment, lung and systemic injury in each group could be evaluated, and different measured parameters could be compared among groups. 2. PQ exposure: Animals in the PQ-exposed groups are subjected to PQ aerosol inhalation, simulating occupational or accidental exposure in farmers working with this herbicide. 3. Assessment measures: To determine the degree of lung and systemic injury and its physiological effects, several assessments, such as biochemical markers, histopathological analysis, and functional tests, are used. The protocol offers reliable and accurate results by using standardized methods and data collection. The effect of PQ exposure on lung and systemic injury could be evaluated by statistical analysis of the collected data, which also makes it easier to identify possible protective agents or interventions. This comprehensive evaluation protocol provides an essential basis for studying the mechanisms behind PQ-induced lung and systemic injury and assessing the effectiveness of preventative or therapeutic strategies in minimizing its adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.