Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883586›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Liquid-nitrogen-free CTAB DNA extraction method from silica-dried specimens for next-generation sequencing and assembly.

Kristine Joyce O Quiñones, Renerio P Gentallan, Emmanuel Bonifacio S Timog, Juan Rodrigo A Vera Cruz, Cherray Gabrielle A Macabecha, Irene A Papa, Nadine B Coronado, Michael Cedric B Bartolome, Daryl B Ceribo, Roselle E Madayag and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  2. Exploring the Complete Chloroplast Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Efficient Marker-Assisted Pyramiding ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kristine Joyce O QuiñonesInstitute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Renerio P GentallanInstitute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Emmanuel Bonifacio S TimogDepartment of Forest Biological Sciences, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Juan Rodrigo A Vera CruzDepartment of Science and Technology, Science Education Institute, Taguig, Manila, Philippines.
Cherray Gabrielle A MacabechaDepartment of Science and Technology, Science Education Institute, Taguig, Manila, Philippines.
Irene A PapaNational Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (BIOTECH-UPLB), College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Nadine B CoronadoInstitute of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Michael Cedric B BartolomeDepartment of Science and Technology, Science Education Institute, Taguig, Manila, Philippines.
Daryl B CeriboDepartment of Science and Technology, Science Education Institute, Taguig, Manila, Philippines.
Roselle E MadayagAgricultural Systems Institute, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Jessabel B MagtoltolAgricultural Systems Institute, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Robert Keith A SienesDepartment of Science and Technology, Science Education Institute, Taguig, Manila, Philippines.
Bartimeus Buiene S AlvaranInstitute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
Teresita H BorromeoInstitute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing requires intact and high-quality DNA. However, typical liquid-nitrogen DNA extraction methods are expensive and not practical for field sample collections. Hence, we present a cost-effective method for DNA extraction from silica-dried leaf samples, eliminating the need for liquid nitrogen. Two protocols were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of grinding dried plant samples without liquid nitrogen in comparison to the standard protocol for tissue homogenization and cell lysis. Protocol 1 involved grinding fresh leaf samples with liquid nitrogen, while Protocol 2 entailed incubating dried plant samples at-20 °C for 1 h before grinding in the absence of liquid nitrogen. Both protocols produced comparable DNA yields with an average A260/A280 ratio of 1.78±0.02, suitable for short- and long-read sequencing. Using Protocol 2, we successfully assembled ten plastomes. It also demonstrated versatility as comparable DNA quality was obtained from dried mollusks and actinomycetes, resulting in the successful assembly of two complete mitochondrial genomes. The protocol is advantageous for research workflows involving the collection of samples in the field as a long-term source of genetic material.•Drying: Fresh samples were silica-dried at silica-to-sample ratio of 2:1.•Pre-lysis: Dried samples were frozen at -20 °C for 1 hour before grinding.•Frozen samples were subjected to tissue homogenization followed by the standard CTAB DNA extraction.

Indexed as

Cell lysisLiquid-Nitrogen-Free CTAB DNA Extraction MethodNext-generation sequencingSilica dryingTissue banking

Identifiers

PMID38883586
PMCPMC11179246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.