Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883507›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024

Criteria for Determining Hearing Disability: A Narrative Review of Global Perspective.

Vishak Ms, Anbarasi Madoure, Kalaiarasi Raja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vishak MsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Anbarasi MadoureDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Kalaiarasi RajaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss is a highly prevalent condition worldwide, affecting over 5% of the global population. Determining disability and eligibility for rehabilitation services due to hearing loss is complex, as countries employ differing audiometric criteria and methods. This report reviews current literature on audiometric thresholds used globally to determine hearing disability, highlighting challenging cases worldwide. Databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for articles on hearing disability criteria published from 2010-present in English. Overall, developed countries employ a pure-tone average (PTA) of ≥ 40 dB as disability criteria, while developing countries use ≥ 41 dB PTA. The World Health Organization uses ≥ 41 dB disabling hearing loss in better ear. Studies show widespread use of a single frequency threshold in some countries can exclude milder losses. Individualized approaches accounting for communication function, rather than fixed PTA cut-offs alone, enable more accurate disability determination. Further research on optimal, equitable criteria accounting for resource availability is needed. Standardized guidelines balancing sensitivity and specificity in disability determination worldwide would enable improved rehabilitation access and outcomes.

Indexed as

Audiometric criteriaHearing lossPure tone audiometry

Identifiers

PMID38883507
PMCPMC11169336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.