Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883447›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024

Outcomes of Cochlear Implant Recipient With ANSD: Intra and Post Operative Findings, Progress in Audition and Speech Skills.

Mathew Sucharita Penumaka, Suryaprakasarao Sreerama, Drkln Raju, Ske Appa Rao, Vikas Nagabathula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathew Sucharita PenumakaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam, 530048 Andhra Pradesh India.ORCID 0000-0002-2790-7089
Suryaprakasarao SreeramaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam, 530048 Andhra Pradesh India.
Drkln RajuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam, 530048 Andhra Pradesh India.
Ske Appa RaoSusruta ENT Clinic, Consultant Cochlear Implant Surgeon and Mentor, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam, 530048 Andhra Pradesh India.
Vikas NagabathulaDepartment of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, MAA Institute of Speech and Hearing, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 500033 Telangana India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a distinct type of SNHL that is characterized by the presence of otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonics. Cochlear implantation was initially not recommended for ANSD children, later studies showed variable outcomes among ANSD. CI is currently the intervention option of choice for many children with ANSD who are unable to obtain benefit from conventional amplification. Aim and Objectives: To review experiences with some of the preoperative and postoperative findings in a child who was diagnosed with auditory neuropathy and provided with cochlear implant. To describe changes in auditory function, which enabled to have significant improvement in hearing and communication skills through auditory verbal therapy (AVT) and regular follow ups. Study Design: Pre and postoperative, findings in cochlear implant recipient who was diagnosed with ANSD. Child received complete medical examinations, including related consultations in audiology, otorhinolaryngology, paediatrics, neurology, psychology, speech language pathology, and radiology. Methodology/Case Report: A 3-year-old-female have brought to the hospital with a C/o not responding to sounds, name call and unable to speak. Medical and Audiological evaluations were initiated. The hearing assessments of the child included appropriate behavioural audiometric techniques, objective measures of middle ear function, acoustic reflex studies, transient evoked (TEOAE), distortion product (DPOAE) otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Implanted with (HiRes Ultra CI HiFocus SlimJ Electrode), and objective measures were recorded intraoperatively electrode impedances and neural response telemetry (NRT) to assess the outcomes technically. These intraoperative objective measures were used to help program the speech processor for the child. Postoperatively, child has had regular follow-up with otorhinolaryngologist to assure complete healing of the surgical incision, to assess their general medical conditions, and audiologist for switch-on (speech processor) followed by mapping. The hearing and communication skills have been assessed, also continued Auditory Verbal Therapy (AVT) on a regular basis. Postoperatively, objective measures were recorded in regular intervals and monitored with therapy outcomes. Results: The child has shown significant improvement in sound detection, speech perception abilities, communication skills and shown evidence of progression of good NRT results, which  were recorded and had no postoperative complications. Conclusion: Experience with cochlear implantation for child diagnosed with ANSD that effectively received and benefited from CI. A detailed and careful evaluations, audiological follow-ups and tailored rehabilitation plans, can be considered as a beneficial management approach for CI, especially who diagnosed with ANSD. The regular use of cochlear implant in this diagnosis can lead to a clear increase in speech comprehension, development and overall progress in quality of life. Success or lack of success with a CI appears to be somewhat dependent on the specific site of lesion (pre- or post-synaptic). Currently there are no clinical measures available to diagnose the specific site of lesion. Indeed, CI appears to be an effective rehabilitation modality for ANSD patients. This may be explained by the fact that the implanted electrode delivers synchronized electrical impulses directly to the auditory nerve, bypassing the presynaptic IHCs and its synapse involved in the unsynchronized firing of the auditory nerve described in ANSD. However, genetic studies that have proven to be essential in the knowledge of underlying mechanisms of ANSD represent a promising therapeutic approach in the management of ANSD.

Indexed as

Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorderAuditory verbal therapyCochlear implantSpeech and language development

Identifiers

PMID38883447
PMCPMC11169118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.