Effectiveness of transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation and the factors affecting its efficacy.

objectiveTo compare the surgical metrics, improvement of functional scores, and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the therapeutic efficacy of PETD.

methodsThe clinical data of LDH (lumbar disc herniation) patients who underwent treatment in Shaanxi Provincial Nuclear Industry 215 Hospital from May 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 70 PEID cases and 74 PETD cases. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical indexes, such as operation time and bleeding volume, as well as changes in functional scores, such as preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the Macnab criteria, and logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent influencing factors of the treatment efficacy of PETD.

resultsThe differences between the two surgical groups were statistically significant in terms of operation time (P<0.001), bleeding (P=0.005), and C-arm X-ray exposure times (P<0.001), and the above indexes were higher in the PETD group; however, there were no statistical differences in terms of improvement in functional scores (P>0.05) and clinical efficacy (P>0.05) between the two groups. BMI≥25 kg/m

conclusionThe clinical effectiveness of PEID and PETD in treating LDH is comparable, and each has its own advantages. While PETD is more technically demanding, it does not yield superior results. Obesity, severe disc degeneration, and prolonged surgery are risk factors for the treatment efficacy of PETD.