ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Analysis of risk factors associated with incision complications in modified "L" approach for calcaneal fracture.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify risk factors associated with incision complications following the modified "L" approach for calcaneal fractures.
methodsData from 100 patients treated with the modified "L" approach for calcaneal fractures between January 2018 and December 2021 were analyzed. These included 52 cases in the poorly healing group and 48 in the well-healing group. Variables such as patient age, sex, body mass index, fracture type (Sanders classification), smoking history, alcohol consumption, diabetes status, timing of surgery, tourniquet use, bone grafting, suture method, and postoperative incision care were evaluated. A nomogram was developed using R software to predict the risk of incision complications, validated through the area under the ROC curve, C-index, and decision curve analysis.
resultsBoth univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified fracture type, smoking history, diabetes, timing of surgery, and duration of tourniquet application as significant predictors of incision complications. These factors were incorporated into a clinical predictive nomogram. The nomogram's calibration curves demonstrated high accuracy, both internally and externally. The unadjusted concordance indes (C-index) was 0.793 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.825-0.995], and the area under the curve for the nomogram was 0.7875882. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical applicability of the model at a threshold probability of 20-60%.
conclusionWe have developed a reliable clinical nomogram to predict the risk factors for incision complications in the modified "L" approach for calcaneal fractures, enhancing decision-making in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.