ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Predictive value of pre-operative prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index for efficacy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic role of inflammatory and tumor biomarkers in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy efficacy in gastric cancer: the interplay between biomarkers and radiomics and its potential for clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the predictive value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in relation to the efficacy and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
methodsData of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received NACT in the 910
resultsMultivariate regression analysis showed that tumor diameter, PNI, and SII were influencing factors for poor efficacy of NACT in patients with stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC. The non-pCR group exhibited a higher mortality within 3 years, thus a lower 3-year overall survival rate than the pCR group (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that both PNI and SII were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC undergoing NACT. Further analysis found a lower 3-year survival rate in patients with low PNI and high SII than in counterparts (P<0.05).
conclusionTumor diameter, PNI and SII are risk factors for poor efficacy in patients with stage IIIa-N2 NSCLC undergoing NACT. Low PNI and high SII can indicate a poor prognosis in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.