ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Effect of intraoperative cell salvage on coagulation function outcomes in patients with massive post-Cesarean section hemorrhage.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the impact of using intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) for the restoration of coagulation function in cases of massive Post-Cesarean Section Hemorrhage (PCSH).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 cases of massive PCSH meeting inclusion criteria at Suqian Maternity and Children's Hospital from January 2020 to July 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: allogeneic blood transfusion group (Group A, n = 30) and ICS group (Group B, n = 30), based on transfusion methods. Blood parameters, coagulation function, and adverse reactions were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) transfusion. Patients were categorized into good prognosis (GP) and poor prognosis (PP) groups based on adverse reaction occurrence. Clinical profiles were compared between groups, and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the factors that may affect the prognosis in women with PCSH.
resultsNo significant differences in routine blood parameters were observed between groups at T0 and T1 (P>0.05). At T0, no significant differences in PT, APTT, TT, or FIB were found between groups (P>0.05). Both groups showed a reduction in PT, APTT, and TT values at T1 compared to T0, with Group B experiencing a more significant decrease than Group A (P<0.05). FIB increased in both groups at T1 compared to T0, with Group B demonstrating a higher increase than Group A (P<0.05). Both groups showed increased blood pressure at T1 compared to T0, with Group B showing a more pronounced elevation than Group A (P<0.05). The occurrence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in Group B (1/30, 3.33%) compared to Group A (7/30, 23.33%) (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified FIB<1.52 g/L and HR<45.35 times/min as factors associated with increased risk of unfavorable outcome in women with PCSH.
conclusionIn patients experiencing significant PCSH, ICS may lead to better postoperative recovery of blood parameters, faster restoration of coagulation function, and reduced risk of adverse events compared to ABT. Moreover, early detection of coagulation function and blood gas indexes is crucial for clinicians to implement timely prevention and treatment measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.