ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Risk factors for ventricular arrhythmias after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma Atherogenic Index Predicts Malignant Arrhythmias in Non-STElevation Myocardial Infarction.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Ventricular Fibrillation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the risk factors for ventricular arrhythmia after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
methodsA retrospective cohort of 201 elderly AMI patients who underwent PCI in the emergency department of No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry from April 2020 to January 2023 was analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (n=134) for model development and a test set (n=67) for model validation. The training set was divided into a ventricular arrhythmia group (n=51) and a non-ventricular arrhythmia group (n=83), based on the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia post-PCI. The factors affecting ventricular arrhythmias were analyzed by logistic regression and Lasso regression models.
resultsLasso regression screened 12 characteristic factors at λ=0.1 se. In the training set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the Lasso model for predicting ventricular arrhythmia was 0.954, which was significantly higher than 0.826 for the Logistic model (P < 0.001). In the test set, the AUC of the Lasso model was 0.962, which was also significantly higher than 0.825 for the Logistic model (P=0.003).
conclusionCompared to the logistic regression model, the Lasso regression model can more accurately predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia after PCI in elderly AMI patients. The Lasso regression model constructed in this study can provide a reference for the clinical identification of high-risk elderly AMI patients and the development of targeted monitoring and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.