ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2024
Efficacy of endovascular embolization versus microsurgical clamping in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IA) can induce increased intracranial pressure, headache, and the development of nausea and vomiting if not treated in time, and failure to receive timely diagnosis and treatment can lead to disability or death. However, the efficacy and prognostic value of craniotomy and endovascular embolization in patients with IA remains a controversial topic. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy of endovascular coiling versus cranial aneurysm clamping on the immediate postoperative outcome and prognosis of patients with IA. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for retrieval of relevant references. Literature was screened according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted and assessed for quality. A total of 10 studies, including 2,654 cases, were included in the analysis. Among them, 1,313 cases underwent craniotomy clipping surgery (clip group), and 1,341 cases underwent endovascular coiling (coil group). The quality of the studies in 8 articles evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was ≥6. Meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.3 and Stata 17 software. The results of meta-analysis showed that no significant difference in complete occlusion rate [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.