Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883269›Full record

ArticleTrauma case reports2024

A case of damage control after polytrauma and bilateral femur fracture.

Dana Avraham, Amir Herman, Maria Oulianski

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dana AvrahamOrthopedic Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Israel.
Amir HermanOrthopedic Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Israel.
Maria OulianskiOrthopedic Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multi-trauma patients require a multidisciplinary team, especially in the presence of various body systems injuries. The evaluation focuses on the decision regarding the DCO and ETC approaches. Case presentation: A 24-year-old male patient with Glasgow Coma Score 8, arrived at the emergency room, followed by ATLS protocol. Orthopedic trauma included D8 vertebra unstable burst fracture, right open femur shaft fracture, left closed midshaft femur fracture, and right tibial plateau fracture of the knee. Case summary: A hemodynamically stable patient with bilateral femur fractures is directed toward the DCO approach. Discussion: An initial treatment for an external fixator across the knee on the right leg and a spine fusion and decompression of D5-10 surgery was made on the day of admission. Definitive fixation and conversion to internal fixators were done on day 9 after the accident. Postoperative drop-foot injury was seen in the right leg. A Masquelet technique was applied for the right femur segmental fracture due to gaps. Conclusion: DCO may be employed to temporarily stabilize fractures, allowing the patient to recover from other life-threatening injuries before definitive fixation. Further secondary procedures, such as the Masquelet technique, should be considered to optimize the results. Long-term follow-up and rehabilitation are part of recovery, aiming to optimize functional recovery and improve the patient's quality of life.

Indexed as

Damage controlEarly total careFemur shaft fractureMasqueletMulti trauma

Identifiers

PMID38883269
PMCPMC11176921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.