Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883241›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

A Hybrid Deep Learning Classification of Perimetric Glaucoma Using Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Reflectance and Other OCT Parameters from Three Anatomy Regions.

Ou Tan, David S Greenfield, Brian A Francis, Rohit Varma, Joel S Schuman, David Huang, Dongseok Choi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ou TanCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University.
David S GreenfieldBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami.
Brian A FrancisDoheny Eye Center and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
Rohit VarmaSouthern California Eye Institute.
Joel S SchumanWills Eye Hospital.
David HuangCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University.
Dongseok ChoiCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University.

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Kate E Keller · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Advanced Imaging for GlaucomaR01EY013516 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HUANG, DAVID · 2003 to 2012
$15.9M
Functional and Structural Optical Coherence Tomography for GlaucomaR01EY023285 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2013 to 2026
$8.8M
Focal nerve fiber layer reflectance analysis for glaucoma evaluationR21EY032146 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TAN, OU · 2021 to 2022
$417k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013516NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023285NEI NIH HHS R21 EY032146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Précis: A hybrid deep-learning model combines NFL reflectance and other OCT parameters to improve glaucoma diagnosis. Objective: To investigate if a deep learning model could be used combine nerve fiber layer (NFL) reflectance and other OCT parameters for glaucoma diagnosis. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective observational study where of 106 normal subjects and 164 perimetric glaucoma (PG) patients. Peripapillary NFL reflectance map, NFL thickness map, optic head analysis of disc, and macular ganglion cell complex thickness were obtained using spectral domain OCT. A hybrid deep learning model combined a fully connected network (FCN) and a convolution neural network (CNN) to develop to combine those OCT maps and parameters to distinguish normal and PG eyes. Two deep learning models were compared based on whether the NFL reflectance map was used as part of the input or not. Results: The hybrid deep learning model with reflectance achieved 0.909 sensitivity at 99% specificity and 0.926 at 95%. The overall accuracy was 0.948 with 0.893 sensitivity and 1.000 specificity, and the AROC was 0.979, which is significantly better than the logistic regression models (p < 0.001). The second best model is the hybrid deep learning model w/o reflectance, which also had significantly higher AROC than logistic regression models (p < 0.001). Logistic regression with reflectance model had slightly higher AROC or sensitivity than the other logistic regression model without reflectance (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Hybrid deep learning model significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy, without or without NFL reflectance. Hybrid deep learning model, combining reflectance/NFL thickness/GCC thickness/ONH parameter, may be a practical model for glaucoma screen purposes.

Identifiers

PMID38883241
PMCPMC11177947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.