ArticleEvidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health2023
Validation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-5) Tic Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Modules.
Article in Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond survey design: Lessons from conducting the National Adolescent Mental Health Surveys.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of new instruments for screening and diagnosis of tics and tic disorders in a well-characterized sample of youth with tics and recruited controls.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective methods to assess mental disorders in children are necessary for accurate prevalence estimates and to monitor prevalence over time. This study assessed updates of the tic disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) modules of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version 5 (DISC-5) that reflect changes in diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth edition, DSM-5). The DISC-5 tic disorder and ADHD parent- and child-report modules were compared to expert clinical assessment for 100 children aged 6-17 years (40 with tic disorder alone, 17 with tic disorder and ADHD, 9 with ADHD alone, and 34 with neither) for validation. For the tic disorder module, parent-report had high (>90%) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, while the youth-report had high specificity and PPV, moderate accuracy (81.4%), and lower sensitivity (69.8%) and NPV (67.3%). The ADHD module performed less well: parent-report had high NPV (91.4%), moderate sensitivity (80.8%), and lower specificity (71.6%), PPV (50.0%), and accuracy (74.0%); youth-report had moderate specificity (82.8%) and NPV (88.3%), and lower sensitivity (65.0%), PPV (54.2%), and accuracy (78.6%). Adding teacher-report of ADHD symptoms to DISC-5 parent-report of ADHD increased sensitivity (94.7%) and NPV (97.1%), but decreased specificity (64.2%), PPV (48.7%), and accuracy (72.2%). These findings support using the parent-report tic disorder module alone or in combination with the child report module in future research and epidemiologic studies; additional validation studies are warranted for the ADHD module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.