Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883231›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health2023

Evaluation of new instruments for screening and diagnosis of tics and tic disorders in a well-characterized sample of youth with tics and recruited controls.

H R Adams, E F Augustine, K Bonifacio, A E Collins, M L Danielson, J W Mink, P Morrison, E van Wijngaarden, J Vermilion, A Vierhile and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving Identification of Tic Disorders in Children.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

H R AdamsDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
E F AugustineDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
K BonifacioRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.
A E CollinsChild Life Program, Golisano Children's Hospital, URMC, Rochester, NY.
M L DanielsonDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
J W MinkDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
P MorrisonDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
E van WijngaardenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, URMC, Rochester, NY.
J VermilionDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
A VierhileDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
R H BitskoDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

University of Rochester Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD103536 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JOHN J FOXE, Anna K Majewska · 2020 to 2026
$9.8M
ACL HHS U01DD001007Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001007NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tics and tic disorders can significantly impact children, but limited screening tools and diagnostic challenges may delay access to care. The current study attempted to address these gaps by evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the Motor or Vocal Inventory of Tics (MOVeIT), a tic symptom screener, and the Description of Tic Symptoms (DoTS), a brief diagnostic assessment for tic disorders. Children (n=100, age 6-17 years old) with tic disorders attending a Tourette specialty clinic and a community-recruited sample without tics completed a gold-standard assessment by a tic expert; these evaluations were compared to child self-report and parent and teacher report versions of the MOVeIT, and child and parent versions of the DoTS. The parent and child MOVeIT met or exceeded pre-specified 85% sensitivity and specificity criteria for detecting the presence of tics when compared to a gold-standard tic expert diagnosis. The Teacher MOVeIT had lower sensitivity (71.4%) but good specificity (95.7%) for identifying any tic symptoms compared to gold standard. For determination of the presence or absence of any tic disorder, sensitivity of both parent and child DoTS was 100%; specificity of the parent DoTS was 92.7% and child DoTS specificity was 75.9%. More work may be needed to refine the teacher MOVeIT, but it is also recognized that tic expression may vary by setting. While the MOVeIT and DoTS parent and child questionnaires demonstrated adequate sensitivity and specificity for determining the presence of tics and tic disorders in this well-defined sample, additional testing in a general population is warranted.

Indexed as

screening toolssensitivityspecificitytic disordersTourette

Identifiers

PMID38883231
PMCPMC11177539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.