Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883228›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024

Therapeutic strategies during cenobamate treatment initiation: Delphi panel recommendations.

Bernhard J Steinhoff, Elinor Ben-Menachem, Pavel Klein, Jukka Peltola, Bettina Schmitz, Rhys H Thomas, Vicente Villanueva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cenobamate for Difficult-to-Treat Epilepsy - Selected Case Vignettes.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bernhard J SteinhoffDepartment for Adults, Kork Epilepsy Center, Landstrasse 1, Kehl-Kork 77694, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-5862
Elinor Ben-MenachemDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pavel KleinMid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jukka PeltolaDepartment of Neurology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Bettina SchmitzDepartment of Neurology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Center for Epilepsy, Berlin, Germany.
Rhys H ThomasDepartment of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Vicente VillanuevaRefractory Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Member of ERN Epicare, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of epilepsy treatment is seizure freedom, typically with antiseizure medication (ASM). If patients fail to attain seizure control despite two trials of appropriately chosen ASMs at adequate doses, they are classified as having drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Adverse events (AEs) commonly occur in people with DRE because they are typically on ⩾2 ASMs, increasing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Early emerging AEs may impact adherence, decrease quality of life, and delay achieving optimal treatment dosages. Cenobamate is an oral ASM with a long half-life which has proven to be highly effective in clinical trials. An international Delphi panel of expert epileptologists experienced in the clinical use of cenobamate and other ASMs was convened to develop consensus best practices for managing patients during and after cenobamate titration, with consideration for its known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, to allow patients to reach the most appropriate cenobamate dose while limiting tolerability issues. The modified Delphi process included one open-ended questionnaire and one virtual face-to-face meeting. Participants agreed that cenobamate can be prescribed for most patients experiencing focal-onset seizures. Patients initiating cenobamate therapy should have access to healthcare professionals as needed and their treatment response should be evaluated at the 100-mg dose. Patients with intellectual disabilities may need additional support to navigate the titration period. Proactive down-titration or withdrawal of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) is recommended when concomitant ASM regimens include ⩾2 SCBs. When applicable, maintaining a concomitant clobazam dose at ~5-10 mg may be beneficial. Patients taking oral contraceptives, newer oral anticoagulants, or HIV antiretroviral medications should be monitored for potential interactions. Because clinical evidence informing treatment decisions is limited, guidance regarding dose adjustments of non-ASM drugs was not developed beyond specific recommendations presented in the Summary of Product Characteristics.

Indexed as

cenobamateDelphi paneldrug–drug interactionsepileptologistfocal epilepsytitration

Identifiers

PMID38883228
PMCPMC11179501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.