Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883160›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024

Incidence of recurrent and chronic pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endre-Botond Gagyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Dániel Sándor Veres, Dániel Pálinkás, Nóra Vörhendi, Klementina Ocskay, Katalin Márta, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Péter Hegyi, Bálint Erőss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Endoscopic Management of Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Endre-Botond GagyiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-9590
Brigitta TeutschCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-7886
Dániel Sándor VeresCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dániel PálinkásCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Nóra VörhendiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Klementina OcskayCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin MártaCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter Jenő HegyiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-0259
Péter HegyiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssInstitute for Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) has a high incidence, and patients can develop recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) after AP. Objectives: We aimed to estimate the pooled incidence rates (IRs), cumulative incidences, and proportions of RAP and CP after AP. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of RAP and CP after AP. Data sources and methods: The systematic search was conducted in three (PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) databases on 19 December 2023. Articles reporting the proportion of RAP or CP in patients after the first and multiple episodes of AP were eligible. The random effects model was used to calculate the pooled IR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Results: We included 119 articles in the quantitative synthesis and 29 in the IRs calculations. Our results showed that the IR of RAP in adult patients after AP was 5.26 per 100 person-years (CI: 3.99-6.94; Conclusion: Our results showed that RAP affects many patients with AP. Compared to patients with the first AP episode, RAP leads to a threefold higher IR for developing CP. Trial registration: Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283252).

Indexed as

acute pancreatitischronic pancreatitisfollow-upincidence raterecurrent acute pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID38883160
PMCPMC11179553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.