Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883146›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Explicitly encoding the cyclic nature of breathing signal allows for accurate breathing motion prediction in radiotherapy with minimal training data.

Andreas Renner, Ingo Gulyas, Martin Buschmann, Gerd Heilemann, Barbara Knäusl, Martin Heilmann, Joachim Widder, Dietmar Georg, Petra Trnková

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreas RennerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingo GulyasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin BuschmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerd HeilemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara KnäuslDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin HeilmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Joachim WidderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar GeorgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Petra TrnkováDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Active breathing motion management in radiotherapy consists of motion monitoring, quantification and mitigation. It is impacted by associated latencies of a few 100 ms. Artificial neural networks can successfully predict breathing motion and eliminate latencies. However, they require usually a large dataset for training. The objective of this work was to demonstrate that explicitly encoding the cyclic nature of the breathing signal into the training data enables significant reduction of training datasets which can be obtained from healthy volunteers. Material and methods: Seventy surface scanner breathing signals from 25 healthy volunteers in anterior-posterior direction were used for training and validation (ratio 4:1) of long short-term memory models. The model performance was compared to a model using decomposition into phase, amplitude and a time-dependent baseline. Testing of the models was performed on 55 independent breathing signals in anterior-posterior direction from surface scanner (35 lung, 20 liver) of 30 patients with a mean breathing amplitude of (5.9 ± 6.7) mm. Results: Using the decomposed breathing signal allowed for a reduction of the absolute root-mean square error (RMSE) from 0.34 mm to 0.12 mm during validation. Testing using patient data yielded an average absolute RMSE of the breathing signal of (0.16 ± 0.11) mm with a prediction horizon of 500 ms. Conclusion: It was demonstrated that a motion prediction model can be trained with less than 100 datasets of healthy volunteers if breathing cycle parameters are considered. Applied to 55 patients, the model predicted breathing motion with a high accuracy.

Indexed as

4D image guidanceIntrafractional motionLong short-term memory networkMotion predictionReal-time tumour motion monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38883146
PMCPMC11176922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.