ArticleCureus2024
Unraveling Patterns of Congenital Structural Malformations in Infants: A Hospital-Based Descriptive Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Newborn screening for external congenital anomalies at three public hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Congenital malformation studies serve several purposes, including establishing baseline rates, monitoring changes over time, exploring the origins of these defects, and helping in planning health services. Increasing public awareness about pediatric surgical interventions is another goal of these studies. However, the impact of congenital malformations is often underestimated in developing countries due to insufficient healthcare data and diagnostic facilities, particularly in rural areas. Families affected by the birth of a child with congenital malformations face significant stress and hardship. Methods The main aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical pattern of congenital structural malformations in our region (Uttarakhand, India), identify possibly associated factors of congenital malformations, and find out the immediate outcome of congenital malformations in enrolled participants. Results Among a total of 150 cases, 73 (48.7%) cases were inborn, whereas 77 (51.3%) cases were outborn. Investigation of congenital malformation revealed cleft lip or palate in 37 (24.7%) cases, congenital heart disease (CHD) in 33 (22%) cases, meningomyelocele (MMC) in 18 (12.0%) cases, anorectal malformation (ARM) in 11 (7.3%) cases, hypospadias in 10 (6.7%) cases, congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) in nine (6.0%) cases, tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) in nine (6.0%) cases, polydactyly in seven (4.7%) cases, pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) in four (2.7%) cases, duodenal atresia in three (2.0%) cases, midgut volvulus in three (2.0%) cases, umbilical sinus in two (1.3%) cases, sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) in one (0.7%) case, phimosis in one (0.7%) case, microtia in one (0.7%) case, and micrognathia in one (0.7%) case. Mortality was observed in 11 (7.3%) cases, whereas 105 (70%) cases were successfully discharged. Among 11 mortality cases, the cause of death was CHD in seven (63.2%) cases, TEF+CHD in two (18.1%) cases, MMC in one (9%) case, and duodenal atresia in one (9%) case. Conclusion Contrary to the common belief that advanced maternal age of greater than 35 years is a major cause, 86.6% of the congenital structural anomalies in our hospital-based study in Uttarakhand occurred in babies of mothers belonging to the age group of 18-30 years. Also, consanguineous marriage was observed in only 3.3% of cases, indicating that it may not be a major contributing factor causing congenital structural malformations in our region. External congenital anomalies are most commonly observed (60.7%), with cleft lip and cleft palate being the most common. The most frequently observed internal congenital anomaly is CHD (22%) followed by gastrointestinal (GI) (18.6%) and urinary anomalies (10.1%). Death and referral are commonly seen in CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.