ArticleCureus2024
Kinematic Assessment Utilizing Xsens Gait Motion Analysis in Upper Cross Syndrome: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) characterizes a prevalent postural dysfunction involving dysfunctional tone in the musculature of the shoulder girdle and cervicothoracic region. The discordant balance among the sternocleidomastoid, pectoralis major, levator scapulae, and upper trapezius musculature potentially precipitated cervical discomfort, thereby hindering routine activities and fostering the progression of UCS. Clinical scales are routinely utilized to assess and monitor the progress of rehabilitation; nonetheless, they often present inherent limitations. In contrast, advancements in three-dimensional (3D) motion capture technology furnish detailed kinematic data, thereby augmenting the capacity to objectively quantify and elucidate movement deficits with heightened precision. This case highlights the critical significance of employing kinematic analysis with Xsens as an outcome measure to elucidate the intricacies of UCS, thereby offering invaluable insights for therapeutic interventions in similar clinical scenarios and providing objective insights into movement biomechanics, muscular function, and functional limitations. Leveraging this information, clinicians can skillfully tailor treatment modalities to address underlying musculoskeletal imbalances, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes. In this case study, we examine the kinematic analysis of a 48-year-old office worker experiencing persistent headaches, restricted range of motion, and neck and shoulder pain over a four-month period. Despite prior interventions, symptomatology deteriorated, prompting consultation with a neurophysiotherapist. The evaluation revealed localized pain in the right shoulder, upper back, and neck, characterized by gradual onset and dull ache, exacerbated by activity and alleviated by rest and medication, without diurnal fluctuations. Physical examination delineated UCS features. Following the implementation of a four-week physiotherapy rehabilitation protocol, initial assessments utilizing Xsens gait motion analysis were undertaken. Subsequent to the rehabilitation program, significant improvements were noted across various parameters. These encompassed augmented range of motion, heightened muscular strength, and enhanced flexibility. Additionally, discernible enhancements were observed in posture and gait, characterized by the restoration of normal cervical spine curvature and an expanded range of motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.