ArticleCureus2024
Healthcare in the Modern Era: Launching a Telemedicine-Based OPD Consultation in Rural Pune (Process, Results, and Challenges).
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Telemedicine serves as a means of overcoming geographical barriers and increasing access to specialist care. This study focuses on the impact of telemedicine on the early diagnosis and treatment of patients, as well as its effect on patient satisfaction. In addition, the study examines the obstacles and facilitators that influence the implementation of telemedicine. Objectives The primary objectives of this study are to assess the effectiveness of telemedicine in facilitating early diagnosis and treatment for patients in need of specialist consultations, to evaluate patient satisfaction with specialist care delivered through telemedicine, and to identify the factors that influence the successful implementation of telemedicine in rural healthcare centers. Methodology An exploratory feasibility study was carried out at two rural health training centers (RHTCs) over a one-year period, enrolling 400 patients requiring specialist consultations. The study involved establishing a telemedicine center, implementing teleconsultations, and collecting data through patient interviews and self-administered questionnaires. Results A majority of teleconsultations, over 79%, were deemed valuable by medical officers, resulting in improved management, better counseling, and earlier diagnoses. More than 76% of patients found telemedicine to be acceptable due to the reduction in travel time and cost. The most common health concerns among patients were diabetes, hypertension, and skin disorders. The study also revealed several challenges, including limited specialist personnel, waiting times, prescription limitations, and connectivity issues. Discussion Telemedicine has proven to be a valuable tool for rural healthcare delivery, providing patients with access to specialist consultations and improving patient outcomes. Both patients and medical officers reported positive experiences with telemedicine. The findings of this study align with existing literature, which highlights the benefits of telemedicine in managing chronic diseases and increasing patient satisfaction. However, it is crucial to address challenges, such as personnel limitations and connectivity issues, to optimize telemedicine's effectiveness. Conclusion Telemedicine offers great potential for enhancing access to specialist care and achieving universal healthcare in rural areas. Despite its limitations, telemedicine demonstrates promising outcomes and warrants further development and optimization to ensure its successful implementation in rural healthcare centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.