ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Analysis of Pharyngeal Airway Changes Following All Four Versus All Five Premolar Extractions in Orthodontic Treatments: A Cephalometric Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthodontic treatment, particularly involving premolar extractions, has been a subject of ongoing debate within the orthodontic community. The impact of such interventions on the pharyngeal airway, a critical component of the respiratory system, remains a topic of exploration.
objectiveThis retrospective cephalometric study aims to investigate changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment involving either all four or all five premolar extractions.
methodsA sample of 68 participants, extracted from orthodontic records, underwent cephalometric analysis to quantify changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions. The study compared two groups: those treated with all four premolar extractions (n=34) and those treated with all five premolar extractions (n=34). Cephalometric radiographs taken before and after treatment were analyzed, focusing on airway width, length, and volume.
resultsPreliminary findings indicate significant changes in airway dimensions within each group. In the all four premolar extraction group, there was a statistically significant decrease in airway width (p=0.02) and volume (p=0.04). Similarly, the all five premolar extraction group exhibited significant reductions in airway width (p=0.03) and volume (p=0.02). However, the between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in changes between the two groups.
conclusionThis study sheds light on the intricate relationship between orthodontic interventions, specifically premolar extractions, and changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions. While significant changes were observed within each group, the lack of significant differences between the all four and all five premolar extraction groups raises intriguing questions about the specific impact of premolar extraction patterns on the upper airway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.