Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882980›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Oncocytic Hyperplastic Nodule Versus Oncocytic Adenoma: Diagnostic Controversies Through a Brief Investigative Case Series Study.

Christos Topalidis, Georgios Petrakis, Triantafyllia Koletsa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christos TopalidisDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
Georgios PetrakisDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
Triantafyllia KoletsaDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncocytes are frequently encountered in routine thyroidectomies. The distinction between oncocytic hyperplastic nodules and oncocytic adenomas (OAs) may be challenging. Although both entities are benign, a precise diagnosis is essential. We present two cases of solitary oncocytic lesions carrying pathogenic mutations in the p53 and NRAS genes, respectively, leading to a histological diagnosis of oncocytic hyperplastic nodules. Additionally, similar oncocytic nodules from two cases of autoimmune thyroiditis did not show any significant findings on molecular analysis (next-generation sequencing, NGS). Hence, this brief investigative series study is of particular diagnostic interest because it prompts pathologists to use the term adenoma when a solitary oncocytic nodule is encountered, regardless of the established criteria for the diagnosis of adenoma. This viewpoint leads to the possible need for the reevaluation of the histological criteria of adenomas when it comes to oncocytic lesions in order to gain a common diagnostic approach and nomenclature among pathologists and overcome any controversies in such cases.

Indexed as

molecular diagnosticsoncocytesoncocytic adenomathyroid neoplasmthyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID38882980
PMCPMC11178239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.