ArticleCureus2024
Should We Consider Routine Blood Work for Diplopia and Ptosis in a Primary Care Setting?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare disorder that most commonly presents with ocular symptoms. Despite the highly sensitive blood work that can be used to diagnose the disease, it is frequently misdiagnosed until the disease becomes systemic. Literature, however, shows that those who begin treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors before systemic presentation have a better prognosis. We discuss the case of a patient who presented to the clinic with a chief complaint of diplopia that was subsequently referred to ophthalmology. It was not until lab work was done by a subspecialist that the diagnosis of MG was made. The patient quickly responded to an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and has since had a great prognosis. Here, we are advocating for the inclusion of routine lab work in the evaluation of patients who present to the primary care setting with diplopia in the absence of red flag symptoms. This approach aids in deciphering the potential involvement of MG in diplopia or ptosis. While such symptoms justify referral to ophthalmology, logistical challenges often hinder a prompt evaluation. Early diagnosis with the incorporation of routine lab work offers the potential to expedite the diagnosis of a rare disease. In doing so, providers can improve prognosis and potentially mitigate additive medical consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.