Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882944›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2024

Systematizing Complaints About Healthcare and Services at University Hospitals: Content Analysis of Patient/Family Letters.

Kenji Takao, Shingo Ueki, Mai Kabayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenji TakaoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-4829
Shingo UekiDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5750-6251
Mai KabayamaDepartment of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient/family complaints are a valuable source of information for providing patient-oriented healthcare. This study aimed to identify and systematize patient/family complaints about healthcare services, focusing on complaints caused by "things." A qualitative descriptive study was designed. Open data of patient and family voices published on the website of university hospital were collected from 27 hospitals for the period June 2020 to August 2020. From the collected data, we excluded praise and compliments, and complaints regarding "people." The results revealed 1,476 complaints, with 1,755 codes. Patient/family complaints were categorized into five domains (access to hospital or line of flow in the hospital, outpatient, inpatient, facilities/equipment, publicity/documents), 46 categories, and 150 sub-categories. A total of 545 codes were excluded to avoid duplication: [1] 253 related to hardware, [2] 222 related to operations, and [3] 70 related to maintenance. This study may provide useful data to inform future studies using patient/family complaints to improve healthcare services for hospitals aiming to provide patient-centered care.

Indexed as

content analysishealth facility environmentpatient-centered carePatients’ complaintssuggestion boxtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38882944
PMCPMC11179509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.