Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882928›Full record

ArticleLanguage, cognition and neuroscience2024

Dyslexics Exhibit an Orthographic, Not a Phonological Deficit in Lexical Decision.

Steven G Luke, Toni Brown, Cole Smith, Adriana Gutierrez, Celeste Tolley, Olivia Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven G LukeBrigham Young University.
Toni BrownBrigham Young University.
Cole SmithBrigham Young University.
Adriana GutierrezBrigham Young University.
Celeste TolleyBrigham Young University.
Olivia FordBrigham Young University.

Funding

Are visual attention deficits in dyslexia reading-specific? A combined eye-tracking/fMRI investigation.R15EY029510 · NEI · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI LUKE, STEVEN · 2018 to 2018
$329k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY029510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyslexia is theorized to be caused by phonological deficits, visuo-attentional deficits, or some combination of the two. The present study contrasted phonological and visuo-attentional theories of dyslexia using a lexical decision task administered to adult participants with and without dyslexia. Homophone and pseudo-homophone stimuli were included to explore whether the two groups differed in their reliance on phonological encoding. Transposed-letter stimuli, including both TL neighbors and TL non-words, measured potential orthographic impairment predicted by visuo-attentional deficit theories. The findings revealed no significant difference in response time or accuracy between the groups for the homophone and pseudo-homophone stimuli. However, dyslexics were significantly slower and less accurate in their responses to the TL stimuli than controls. Thus, dyslexics presented deficits consistent with visuo-attentional theories, but not with the phonological deficit theory.

Indexed as

DyslexiaHomophoneLexical DecisionOrthographicPhonologicalTransposed-Letter

Identifiers

PMID38882928
PMCPMC11178288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.