Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882915›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2024

Development and Safety Trial of the OstreaVent2™ Prototype for Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients.

Maria Esterlita T Villanueva-Uy, Enrique M Ostrea, Alexander P Paran, Manuel C Jorge, Kriselda Karlene G Tan, Herbert G Uy, E Vincent S Faustino, Robert O Dizon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Esterlita T Villanueva-UyInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Enrique M OstreaInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Alexander P ParanMetals Industry and Research Development Center, Department of Science and Technology, Taguig City, Philippines.
Manuel C JorgeDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Kriselda Karlene G TanSection of Adult Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Herbert G UyDepartment of Pediatrics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
E Vincent S FaustinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Robert O DizonMetals Industry and Research Development Center, Department of Science and Technology, Taguig City, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the surge of COVID-19 infections, there were concerns about shortage of mechanical ventilator in several countries including the Philippines. Objective: To transform a locally made, low-cost, neonatal ventilator into a volume- and pressure-controlled, adult ventilator and to determine its safe use among ventilated, adult patients at the Philippine General Hospital. Methods: The modification of the neonatal ventilator (OstreaVent1) to the adult OstreaVent2 was based on the critical need for adult ventilators, in volume or pressure mode, in the Philippines due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The adult ventilator settings were calibrated and tested for two days to check for consistency and tolerance and then submitted to a third party for certification. Once certified, a safety trial of 10 stable adult patients on mechanical ventilator was conducted. The patients were placed on the OstreaVent2 for four hours while ventilator parameters, patient's vital signs, and arterial blood gases were monitored at baseline, during, and after placement on the OstreaVent2. A post-study chest radiograph was also done to rule out pulmonary complications, particularly atelectasis and pneumothorax. Results: The prototype OstreaVent2 received an FDA Certification for Medical Listing after passing its third-party certification. Ten patients (60% male) recruited in the study had a mean age of 39.1 ± 11.6 years. Half of the patients had a diagnosis of non-COVID-19 pneumonia. During the 4-hour study period, the patients while on the OstreaVent2, had stable ventilator settings and most of the variabilities were within the acceptable tolerances. Vital signs were stable and arterial blood gases were within normal limits. One patient developed alar flaring which was relieved by endotracheal tube suctioning. No patient was withdrawn from the study. One patient who was already transferred out of the ICU subsequently deteriorated and died three days after transfer to the stepdown unit from a non-ventilator related cause. Conclusion: The new OstreaVent2 is safe to use among adults who need ventilator support. Variabilities in the ventilator's performance were within acceptable tolerances. Clinical and blood gas measurements of the patients were stable while on the ventilator.

Indexed as

adult ventilatorOstreaVent1OstreaVent2

Identifiers

PMID38882915
PMCPMC11168947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.