Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882823›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction between Invisible Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances - A Systematic Review.

Milling Tania, S Veerasankar, Harish Ponniah, L Xavier Dhayananth, R Preeti, Mary Sheloni Missier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milling TaniaDepartment of Orthodontics, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Kavalkinaru, Tamil Nadu, India.
S VeerasankarDepartment of Orthodontics, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Kavalkinaru, Tamil Nadu, India.
Harish PonniahDepartment of Orthodontics, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Kavalkinaru, Tamil Nadu, India.
L Xavier DhayananthDepartment of Orthodontics, Satyabama Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
R PreetiDepartment of Orthodontics, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Kavalkinaru, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mary Sheloni MissierDepartment of Orthodontics, Matha Dental College and Hospital, Sikkarayapuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the patient acceptance between fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligners. An electronic search was completed in PubMed, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, Google Scholar, and Open Grey databases without any restrictions until August 23. All comparative study types contrasting patient perception between clear aligners and fixed appliances were included. After removal of duplicates, exclusion by title and abstract, and reading the full text, only eight articles were included. The studies used an observational questionnaire study design. Of the observational studies, one was retrospective and three prospective, one online survey, and the other three cross sectional. Though the response varied in terms of patient preference and acceptance, it was found that clear aligners have a positive impact with respect to quality of life, tolerance, and improved confidence. However, there is not enough evidence to make a final conclusion about treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Fixed applianceinvisible appliancepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38882823
PMCPMC11174202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.