Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882634›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024

Imaging differentiation of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas.

Ekaterina Khristenko, Matthias M Gaida, Christine Tjaden, Verena Steinle, Martin Loos, Korbinian Krieger, Tim F Weber, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Miriam Klauß, Philipp Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ekaterina KhristenkoClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Matthias M GaidaInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, JGU-Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany.
Christine TjadenDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Verena SteinleClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Martin LoosDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Korbinian KriegerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Tim F WeberClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich KauczorClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Miriam KlaußClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Philipp MayerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to compare the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). Method: Lesion imaging features of 39 patients with SPNs and 127 patients with pNENs were retrospectively extracted from 104 CT and 91 MRI scans. Results: Compared to pNEN patients, SPN patients were significantly younger (mean age 51.8 yrs versus 32.7 yrs) and more often female (female: male ratio, 5.50:1 versus 1.19:1). Most SPNs and pNENs presented as well-defined lesions with an expansive growth pattern. SPNs more often appeared as round or ovoid lesions, compared to pNENs which showed a lobulated or irregular shape in more than half of cases (p<0.01). A surrounding capsule was detected in the majority of SPNs, but only in a minority of pNENs (<0.01). Hemorrhage occurred non-significantly more often in SPNs (p=0.09). Signal inhomogeneity in T1-fat-saturated (p<0.01) and T2-weighted imaging (p=0.046) as well as cystic degeneration (p<0.01) were more often observed in SPNs. Hyperenhancement in the arterial and portal-venous phase was more common in pNENs (p<0.01). Enlargement of locoregional lymph nodes (p<0.01) and liver metastases (p=0.03) were observed in some pNEN patients, but not in SPN patients. Multivariate logistic regression identified the presence of a capsule (p<0.01), absence of arterial hyperenhancement (p<0.01), and low patient age (p<0.01), as independent predictors for SPN. Conclusions: The present study provides three key features for differentiating SPNs from pNENs extracted from a large patient cohort: presence of a capsule, absence of arterial hyperenhancement, and low patient age.

Indexed as

computed tomographyFrantz tumormagnetic resonance imagingpancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomapancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasmsolid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID38882634
PMCPMC11176946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.