ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
Natural History and Management of Ultrasound-detected Small Renal Angiomyolipoma.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for giant renal angio-myolipoma].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
- B-Mode Ultrasound Radiomics for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Small Hyperechoic Renal Masses: An Exploratory Single-Center Experience.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent advances in imaging methods increased the incidental detection of small renal angiomyolipoma (AML). However, guidelines for managing small AML are lacking, and decisions about imaging frequency and timing of intervention are made on an individual basis. This study aims to investigate the clinical behavior of small sporadic AML and propose an optimal follow-up strategy. Methods: The study is a retrospective analysis of 168 individuals who had hyperechoic lesions, suggestive of AML detected during abdominal ultrasound as a part of their health checkup. The clinical information of the individuals, including tumor characteristics and renal function, was reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with tumor growth and renal function. Results: Most AMLs were small (≤20 mm) and did not exhibit malignant characteristics. The tumors showed a slow growth rate, with a mean growth rate of 0.24 mm/year. Only a small proportion of cases (1.2%) required intervention due to significant enlargement. Factors such as tumor size and gender were not significantly associated with tumor growth rate or renal function. However, younger patients showed a higher tumor growth rate and a more pronounced decline in renal function. Conclusion: Small sporadic AMLs have a slow growth rate and little risk of malignancy. Neither tumor size nor gender was predictive factors for tumor growth or renal function. Nevertheless, close monitoring of tumor growth and renal function is advised, particularly in younger patients. This study highlights the need for further research and guidelines to establish an optimal surveillance protocol for small AMLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.