ArticleJPRAS open2024
Analysis of reconstructed oropharynx shape after total glossolaryngectomy reconstruction using a free rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.
Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Restoring oral intake through oropharyngeal reconstruction is vital for patients undergoing total glossolaryngectomy. Despite its importance, research in this area is limited, leaving clinicians with few guidelines. The debate regarding the optimal shape of the reconstructed oropharynx highlights the need for further research. Methods: This retrospective study analysed data from 16 consecutive patients who underwent primary reconstruction with a free rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap after total glossolaryngectomy at the University of the Ryukyus Hospital between April 2015 and March 2022. Parameters assessed included reconstructed oropharynx shape (flat or funnel-shaped), demographics, flap characteristics, post-operative course and oral intake outcomes. Results: Among the 16 patients, 10 had flat oropharynx, whereas 6 had a funnel-shaped oropharynx. At 6 months post-surgery, 13 patients resumed oral feeding, whereas 3 did not. Significant differences were observed between the groups in preoperative body mass index (21.1 kg/m² vs 17.8 kg/m², Welch's t-test, p=0.035) and days until the first oral intake (34.2 days vs 19.2 days, Welch's t-test, p=0.01). However, no significant differences were found in the form of oral intake at 6 months after surgery (Fisher's exact test, p=0.518). Conclusion: This study suggests that the shape of the reconstructed oropharynx (flat or funnel-shaped) does not significantly impact long-term post-operative oral intake. These findings provide valuable insights into oropharyngeal reconstruction outcomes after total glossolaryngectomy and offer guidance for future research in this area. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical implications of these findings and address any limitations of this study, particularly those regarding sample size constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.