Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882593›Full record

ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2019

Iterative Development of a Tailored mHealth Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Lisa A Schwartz, Alexandra M Psihogios, Dare Henry-Moss, Lauren C Daniel, Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve, Blanca Velazquez-Martin, Eliana Butler, Wendy L Hobbie, Natasha Buchanan Lunsford, Susan A Sabatino and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Contextual Predictors of Engagement in a Tailored mHealth Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advances in pediatric psychooncology.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Lisa A SchwartzThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Alexandra M PsihogiosThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Dare Henry-MossUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Lauren C DanielThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Elizabeth S Ver HoeveThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Blanca Velazquez-MartinThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Eliana ButlerThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Wendy L HobbieThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Natasha Buchanan LunsfordDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Susan A SabatinoDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Lamia P BarakatThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Jill P GinsbergThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Linda FleisherThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Janet A DeatrickUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Linda A JacobsUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Bridget O'HaganThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Lindsay AndersonThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Emily FredericksC.S. Mott Children's Hospital.
Sandra AmaralThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Nadia DowshenThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Keisha HoustonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Carolyn VachaniUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Margaret K HampshireUniversity of Pennsylvania.
James M MetzUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Christine E Hill-KayserUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Dava SzaldaThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

Funding

ACL HHS U48DP005053EPA EP-C-15-001Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Methods for developing mobile health (mHealth) interventions are not well described. To guide the development of future mHealth interventions, we describe the application of the agile science framework to iteratively develop a mHealth intervention for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer. Methods: We created the AYA STEPS mobile app (AYA Self-management via Texting, Education, and Plans for Survivorship) by modifying and integrating two existing programs: an online survivorship care plan (SCP) generator and a text messaging self-management intervention for AYA off treatment. The iterative development process involved three stages of agile science: 1) Formative work, 2) Obtaining feedback about the first AYA STEPS prototype, and 3) Pilot testing and finalization of a prototype. We determined preferences of AYA stakeholders as well as discovered and addressed technology problems prior to beginning a subsequent randomized controlled trial. Results: AYA survivors reported that the app and the embedded tailored messages related to their health and SCP, were easy to use and generally satisfying and beneficial. Usage data supported that AYA were engaged in the app. Technology glitches were discovered in the pilot and addressed. Conclusions: The iterative development of AYA STEPS was essential for creating a consistent and acceptable end user experience. This study serves as one example of how behavioral scientists may apply agile science to their own mHealth research.

Indexed as

adolescents/young adultsagilecancerchronic illnessmHealthself-management

Identifiers

PMID38882593
PMCPMC11177339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.