ArticleBiochemia medica2024
Automated high throughput IgG N-glycosylation sample preparation method development on the Tecan Freedom EVO platform.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glycan clock of ageing-analytical precision and time-dependent inter- and i-individual variability.GeroScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glycomics, focusing on the role of glycans in biological processes, particularly their influence on the folding, stability and receptor interactions of glycoconjugates like antibodies, is vital for our understanding of biology. Changes in immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycosylation have been associated with various physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Nevertheless, time-consuming manual sample preparation is one of the limitations in the glycomics diagnostic implementation. The study aimed to develop an automated method for sample preparation on the Tecan Freedom Evo 200 platform and compare its efficiency and precision with the manual counterpart. Materials and methods: The initial method development included 32 pooled blood plasma technical replicates. An additional 24 pooled samples were used in the method comparison along with 78 random duplicates of plasma samples collected from 10,001 Dalmatians biobank to compare the manual and automated methods. Results: The development resulted in a new automated method. For the automated method, glycan peaks comprising 91% of the total sample glycan showed a variation of less than 5% while 92% of the total sample showed a variation of less than 5% for the manual method. The results of the Passing-Bablok regression indicated no differences between the automated and manual methods for 12 glycan peaks (GPs). However, for 8 GPs systematic difference was present, while both systematic and proportional differences were present for four GPs. Conclusions: The developed automated sample preparation method for IgG glycan analysis reduced exposure to hazardous chemicals and offered a simplified workflow. Despite slight differences between the methods, the new automated method showed high precision and proved to be highly comparable to its manual counterpart.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.