Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882574›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Impacts of farming activities on carbon deposition based on fine soil subtype classification.

Qiuju Wang, Dongdong Zhang, Feng Jiao, Haibin Zhang, Zhenhua Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiuju WangHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition, Heilongjiang Institute of Black Soil Protection and Utilization, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Dongdong ZhangHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, China.
Feng JiaoHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, China.
Haibin ZhangHeilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition, Heilongjiang Institute of Black Soil Protection and Utilization, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Zhenhua GuoHeilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Soil has the highest carbon sink storage in terrestrial ecosystems but human farming activities affect soil carbon deposition. In this study, land cultivated for 70 years was selected. The premise of the experiment was that the soil could be finely categorized by subtype classification. We consider that farming activities affect the soil bacterial community and soil organic carbon (SOC) deposition differently in the three subtypes of albic black soils. Methods: Ninety soil samples were collected and the soil bacterial community structure was analysed by high-throughput sequencing. Relative changes in SOC were explored and SOC content was analysed in association with bacterial concentrations. Results: The results showed that the effects of farming activities on SOC deposition and soil bacterial communities differed among the soil subtypes. Carbohydrate organic carbon (COC) concentrations were significantly higher in the gleying subtype than in the typical and meadow subtypes. Discussion: The results of the present study provide a reference for rational land use to maintain sustainable development and also for the carbon cycle of the earth.

Indexed as

carbon sinkland-use modelSanjiang Plainsoil bacterial communitysoil organic carbon

Identifiers

PMID38882574
PMCPMC11176552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.