ArticleiMeta2024
ChatGPT and generative AI are revolutionizing the scientific community: A Janus-faced conundrum.
Article in iMeta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of a large language model (ChatGPT) versus human researchers in assessing risk-of-bias and community engagement levels: a systematic review use-case analysis.European journal of public health · 2025Pooled it
- DESIGN: a framework for generative AI-enabled crop molecular design-driven breeding.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Performance of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-5 in the Generation of North American Spine Society Clinical Guidelines for Adult Vertebral Compression Fractures: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Performance of DeepSeek V3.2 and ChatGPT 5.1 in Musculoskeletal Triage and Differential Diagnosis of Outpatients With Low Back Pain: Multidimensional Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of LLMs and machine learning in predicting complications after percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Reporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research: the GAMER Statement.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Performance of State-of-the-Art Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Based on the WHO Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Approaching the holistic transcriptome-convolution and deconvolution in transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Beneficial microorganisms: Regulating growth and defense for plant welfare.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Half-Century Scientometric Analysis: Unveiling the Excellence of Fungi as Biocontrol Agents and Biofertilisers.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- What's so special about special issues: Highlighting a central role ofParasitology · 2025Article
- USEARCH 12: Open-source software for sequencing analysis in bioinformatics and microbiome.iMeta · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies marks a transformative moment for the scientific sphere, unlocking novel avenues to elevate scientific writing's efficiency and quality, expedite insight discovery, and enhance code development processes. Essential to leveraging these advancements is prompt engineering, a method that enhances AI interaction efficiency and quality. Despite its benefits, effective application requires blending researchers' expertise with AI, avoiding overreliance. A balanced strategy of integrating AI with independent critical thinking ensures the advancement and quality of scientific research, leveraging innovation while maintaining research integrity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.