Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882466›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2024

Postoperative Continuous Passive Motion Does Not Improve the Range of Movement Achieved After Manipulation Under Anesthetic for Stiffness in Total Knee Replacement.

Bernard H van Duren, Katie Lee, Amy M Firth, Efosa Imuetinyan, Kevin Ilo, Reshid Berber, Hosam E Matar, Benjamin V Bloch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernard H van DurenNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Katie LeeNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Amy M FirthNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Efosa ImuetinyanNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Kevin IloNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Reshid BerberNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Hosam E MatarNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Benjamin V BlochNottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stiffness is a common complication following total knee arthroplasty. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an intervention that can potentially improve range of motion (ROM). Continuous passive motion (CPM) therapy has been utilized to enhance post-MUA ROM, but its effectiveness remains debated. This study assesses whether CPM therapy after MUA results in superior ROM outcomes compared to MUA alone. Methods: A retrospective analysis included patients undergoing MUA for stiff primary total knee arthroplasty between 2017 and 2022. Demographics and ROM data were collected. Patients were in 2 groups: those who received inpatient CPM post-MUA and those who received day-case MUA alone. Complications and further interventions were noted. Results: Of 126 patients, 39 underwent MUA only (day-case group), and 87 received CPM and MUA (inpatient group). Mean preoperative ROM was 69.4° (standard deviation [SD]:18.0°) and 73.9° (SD: 18.1°) for inpatient and day-case groups, respectively. Mean post-MUA ROM improved by 39.4° (SD: 17.7°) and 25.5° (SD: 11.1°) inpatient groups and day-case, respectively. The mean percentage of ROM gained at MUA maintained at final follow-up was 63.7% (40.8%) and 67.0% (47.5%) inpatient and day-case groups, respectively. Conclusions: This study found no advantage in the routine use of CPM post-MUA for stiff total knee replacement patients, suggesting it may not provide sustained ROM improvements compared to MUA alone. Cost-effectiveness and patient selection merit further investigation.

Indexed as

CPMMUAROMStiffnessTKA

Identifiers

PMID38882466
PMCPMC11180303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.