Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38882444›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Adjuvant donafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma patients at high-risk of recurrence after radical resection: a real-world experience.

Shenyu Zhang, Guibin Yang, Ruipeng Song, Wei Wang, Fanzheng Meng, Dalong Yin, Jiabei Wang, Shugeng Zhang, Wei Cai, Yao Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Targeting Metabolism: Innovative Therapies for MASLD Unveiled.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shenyu ZhangDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2338-4016
Guibin YangDepartment of Hepatic-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, No. 2 People's Hospital of Fuyang City, Fuyang, Anhui, China.
Ruipeng SongDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wei WangDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Fanzheng MengDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Dalong YinDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jiabei WangDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Shugeng ZhangDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wei CaiDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yao LiuDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Dayong LuoDepartment of Hepatic-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, No. 2 People's Hospital of Fuyang City, 1088 Yinghe West Road, Yingzhou District, Fuyang, Anhui 236015, China.
Jizhou WangDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-072X
Lianxin LiuDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-6467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant therapy is used to reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and improve patient prognosis. Exploration of treatment strategies that are both efficacious and safe has been extensively performed in the recent years. Although donafenib has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of advanced HCC, its use as adjuvant therapy in HCC has not been reported. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant donafenib treatment in patients with HCC at high-risk of recurrence. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: A total of 196 patients with HCC at high-risk of recurrence were included in this study. Of these, 49 received adjuvant donafenib treatment, while 147 did not. Survival outcomes and incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the donafenib-treated group were compared. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used. Results: The median follow-up duration was 21.8 months [interquartile range (IQR) 17.2-27.1]. Before IPTW, the donafenib-treated group exhibited a significantly higher 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (83.7% Conclusion: Postoperative adjuvant donafenib treatment effectively reduced early recurrence among patients with HCC at high-risk of recurrence, while exhibiting favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, these findings warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

adverse eventsdonafenibefficacyhepatocellular carcinomapostoperative adjuvant therapysafety

Identifiers

PMID38882444
PMCPMC11179452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.