ArticleHeliyon2024
Association of in situ thrombus within the patent foramen ovale and patients with migraine: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in children diagnosed with migraine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with migraine; however, the mechanism of PFO-associated migraine is not well known; additionally, percutaneous closure is controversial. This study aimed to investigate in situ thrombi within the PFO and explore the possible predictors of the effectiveness of PFO closure in migraineurs. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 48 asymptomatic patients and 92 migraineurs with PFO. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the PFO microstructure. Only migraineurs underwent percutaneous closure. Migraineurs were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of a thrombus within the PFO. The symptoms were assessed at the 12-month follow-up visit. Predictors were evaluated employing multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Results: In situ thrombi within PFO were identified in 69 migraineurs and in two asymptomatic patients (76.7 % vs. 4.3 %; P < 0.001). Additionally, endocardial irregularity, discontinuity, low signal, and spasm were found in 59 (65.6 %), 15 (16.7 %), 13 (14.4 %), and six (6.7 %) patients, respectively, in the migraine group. In situ thrombus was associated with migraine risk (OR 49.03; 95%CI 8.52-282.18; P < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up of the migraineur cohort, the primary endpoint, a 50 % reduction in migraine frequency after closure (with or without thrombus in PFO) was met (85.3 % vs. 25.0 %; P < 0.001). In situ thrombus was associated with migraine relief (OR 6.75; 95%CI 1.28-35.56; P = 0.024). Conclusions: In situ thrombus and abnormal endocardium within PFOs were common in migraineurs, and in situ thrombus was a risk factor for migraine. Percutaneous closure was more effective in migraineurs with thrombi within the PFO. OCT imaging improved the understanding of pathogenic PFOs and may be helpful in selecting suitable migraineurs for PFO closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.